ftyk fo|ky; fujh{kd dk;kZy; iqjkuk Hkou d0ua0 2 PS 138
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP228 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 228 | 51.70% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 160 | 36.28% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 42 | 9.52% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 7 | 1.59% | |
| 5 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 2 | 0.45% | |
| 6 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 7 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 8 | Suryanath | AK | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 441 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 228 | 51.47% | 1 | 231 | Strong |
| SP | 160 | 36.12% | 2 | 264 | Average |
| INC | 42 | 9.48% | 3 | 131 | Poor |
| BSP | 7 | 1.58% | 4 | 275 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.45% | 5 | 167 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.23% | 6 | 335 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.23% | 7 | 193 | Poor |
| ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 273 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 263 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 264 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 223 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.