izk0fo0 c?kbZ vgyokj d0la01 PS 1
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP268 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 268 | 61.33% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 128 | 29.29% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 27 | 6.18% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 6 | 1.37% | |
| 5 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 6 | Suryanath | AK | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 7 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 8 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 9 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 10 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 437 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 268 | 59.56% | 1 | 173 | Strong |
| SP | 128 | 28.44% | 2 | 308 | Average |
| INC | 27 | 6.00% | 3 | 234 | Poor |
| BSP | 6 | 1.33% | 4 | 287 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.44% | 7 | 289 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.44% | 8 | 118 | Poor |
| ABAD | 2 | 0.44% | 5 | 39 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.44% | 6 | 34 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 180 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 128 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 318 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.