PRA.VI. MEHAURA ROOM NO-1 PS 509
GOMTI YADAV
SPSamajwadi Party352 votes at this polling station
over YOGESH SHUKLA (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GOMTI YADAV | SP | 352 | 53.91% | |
| 2 | YOGESH SHUKLA | BJP | 151 | 23.12% | |
| 3 | SALAUDDIN 'MUSSAN' | BSP | 137 | 20.98% | |
| 4 | SHYAMU VERMA | SDU | 3 | 0.46% | |
| 5 | SUNIL KUMAR Alias S. K. SINGHANIYA | ASPKR | 3 | 0.46% | |
| 6 | RISHI JAISWAL 'GAPPU' | GPP | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 7 | LALAN KUMAR | INC | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 8 | KISHOR KUMAR | KRP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 9 | PANKAJ SINGH ADVOCATE | RRP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | ARVIND KUMAR TIWARI | LBP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | BALARAM VERMA LODHI | SSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | VIPIN TYAGI | MARD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 653 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 352 | 53.25% | 1 | 87 | Strong |
| BJP | 151 | 22.84% | 2 | 427 | Weak |
| BSP | 137 | 20.73% | 3 | 69 | Weak |
| ASPKR | 3 | 0.45% | 4 | 162 | Poor |
| SDU | 3 | 0.45% | 5 | 82 | Poor |
| GPP | 2 | 0.30% | 6 | 158 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.30% | 7 | 499 | Poor |
| KRP | 1 | 0.15% | 8 | 212 | Poor |
| LBP | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 269 | Poor |
| RRP | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 203 | Poor |
| MARD | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 510 | Poor |
| SSP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 510 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 169, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.