PRA.VI. ANAURA KALA ROOM NO-1 PS 496
GOMTI YADAV
SPSamajwadi Party661 votes at this polling station
over YOGESH SHUKLA (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GOMTI YADAV | SP | 661 | 76.06% | |
| 2 | YOGESH SHUKLA | BJP | 189 | 21.75% | |
| 3 | SALAUDDIN 'MUSSAN' | BSP | 11 | 1.27% | |
| 4 | LALAN KUMAR | INC | 2 | 0.23% | |
| 5 | SHYAMU VERMA | SDU | 2 | 0.23% | |
| 6 | RISHI JAISWAL 'GAPPU' | GPP | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 7 | PANKAJ SINGH ADVOCATE | RRP | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 8 | BALARAM VERMA LODHI | SSP | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 9 | VIPIN TYAGI | MARD | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 10 | KISHOR KUMAR | KRP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ARVIND KUMAR TIWARI | LBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SUNIL KUMAR Alias S. K. SINGHANIYA | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 869 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 661 | 75.63% | 1 | 1 | Strong |
| BJP | 189 | 21.62% | 2 | 390 | Weak |
| BSP | 11 | 1.26% | 3 | 456 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.23% | 4 | 497 | Poor |
| SDU | 2 | 0.23% | 5 | 156 | Poor |
| SSP | 1 | 0.11% | 9 | 268 | Poor |
| MARD | 1 | 0.11% | 7 | 257 | Poor |
| RRP | 1 | 0.11% | 8 | 200 | Poor |
| GPP | 1 | 0.11% | 6 | 308 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 504 | Poor |
| KRP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 503 | Poor |
| LBP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 502 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 169, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.