P.P. HASNAPUR PS 91
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP195 votes at this polling station
over Padamrag Singh Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 195 | 52.14% | |
| 2 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 80 | 21.39% | |
| 3 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 43 | 11.50% | |
| 4 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 37 | 9.89% | |
| 5 | Ramesh | BSS | 5 | 1.34% | |
| 6 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 5 | 1.34% | |
| 7 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 8 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 9 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 10 | Ramveer | IND | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 11 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 12 | Ritoo | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Vedram | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 374 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 195 | 51.86% | 1 | 299 | Strong |
| SP | 80 | 21.28% | 2 | 400 | Weak |
| BSP | 43 | 11.44% | 3 | 185 | Weak |
| INC | 37 | 9.84% | 4 | 91 | Poor |
| IND | 14 | 3.72% | 5 | 98 | Poor |
| BSS | 5 | 1.33% | 6 | 9 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 210 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 360 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 293 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.