P.P. NAGLA PATTU PS 86
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP260 votes at this polling station
over Padamrag Singh Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 260 | 39.10% | |
| 2 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 197 | 29.62% | |
| 3 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 126 | 18.95% | |
| 4 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 47 | 7.07% | |
| 5 | Ramveer | IND | 6 | 0.90% | |
| 6 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 5 | 0.75% | |
| 7 | Vedram | JAP | 5 | 0.75% | |
| 8 | Ramesh | BSS | 4 | 0.60% | |
| 9 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 10 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 11 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 12 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 13 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 14 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 15 | Ritoo | BSCP | 1 | 0.15% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 665 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 260 | 38.69% | 1 | 191 | Average |
| SP | 197 | 29.32% | 2 | 170 | Average |
| BSP | 126 | 18.75% | 3 | 32 | Weak |
| INC | 47 | 6.99% | 4 | 68 | Poor |
| IND | 22 | 3.27% | 5 | 21 | Poor |
| JAP | 5 | 0.74% | 6 | 162 | Poor |
| BSS | 4 | 0.60% | 7 | 14 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.45% | 8 | 37 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 79 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.