P.P. BEHTI PS 83
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP388 votes at this polling station
over Rajvardhan Singh (INC)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 388 | 53.89% | |
| 2 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 140 | 19.44% | |
| 3 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 134 | 18.61% | |
| 4 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 22 | 3.06% | |
| 5 | Ramveer | IND | 7 | 0.97% | |
| 6 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 7 | 0.97% | |
| 7 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 7 | 0.97% | |
| 8 | Vedram | JAP | 5 | 0.69% | |
| 9 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 10 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 11 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 13 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 14 | Ramesh | BSS | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 15 | Ritoo | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 720 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 388 | 53.37% | 1 | 39 | Strong |
| INC | 140 | 19.26% | 2 | 2 | Weak |
| SP | 134 | 18.43% | 3 | 298 | Weak |
| IND | 29 | 3.99% | 4 | 5 | Poor |
| BSP | 22 | 3.03% | 5 | 275 | Poor |
| JAP | 5 | 0.69% | 6 | 161 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.14% | 7 | 130 | Poor |
| BSS | 1 | 0.14% | 8 | 139 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 206 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.