P.P. MANPARA PS 58
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP349 votes at this polling station
over Padamrag Singh Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 349 | 57.78% | |
| 2 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 161 | 26.66% | |
| 3 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 37 | 6.13% | |
| 4 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 27 | 4.47% | |
| 5 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 6 | 0.99% | |
| 6 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 5 | 0.83% | |
| 7 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 4 | 0.66% | |
| 8 | Ramveer | IND | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 9 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 10 | Ramesh | BSS | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 11 | Ritoo | BSCP | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 12 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 13 | Vedram | JAP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 14 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 15 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 1 | 0.17% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 604 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 349 | 57.50% | 1 | 80 | Strong |
| SP | 161 | 26.52% | 2 | 242 | Average |
| BSP | 37 | 6.10% | 3 | 206 | Poor |
| INC | 27 | 4.45% | 4 | 134 | Poor |
| IND | 24 | 3.95% | 5 | 12 | Poor |
| BSS | 2 | 0.33% | 7 | 54 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.33% | 6 | 24 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 249 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 125 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.