P.P. SAHIJANA PS 459
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP198 votes at this polling station
over Vedram (JAP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 198 | 53.08% | |
| 2 | Vedram | JAP | 95 | 25.47% | |
| 3 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 26 | 6.97% | |
| 4 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 23 | 6.17% | |
| 5 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 11 | 2.95% | |
| 6 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 5 | 1.34% | |
| 7 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 4 | 1.07% | |
| 8 | Ramesh | BSS | 2 | 0.54% | |
| 9 | Ritoo | BSCP | 2 | 0.54% | |
| 10 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 2 | 0.54% | |
| 11 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 2 | 0.54% | |
| 12 | Ramveer | IND | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 13 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 14 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 15 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 373 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 198 | 52.66% | 1 | 294 | Strong |
| JAP | 95 | 25.27% | 2 | 8 | Average |
| BSP | 26 | 6.91% | 3 | 262 | Poor |
| SP | 23 | 6.12% | 4 | 479 | Poor |
| IND | 12 | 3.19% | 5 | 147 | Poor |
| INC | 11 | 2.93% | 6 | 318 | Poor |
| ASP | 4 | 1.06% | 7 | 32 | Poor |
| BSS | 2 | 0.53% | 9 | 113 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.53% | 8 | 55 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.