P.P. KARANPUR MATNI R.N. 2 PS 449
Padamrag Singh Yadav
SPsp328 votes at this polling station
over Madhavendra Pratap Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 328 | 56.94% | |
| 2 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 125 | 21.70% | |
| 3 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 79 | 13.72% | |
| 4 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 22 | 3.82% | |
| 5 | Ramesh | BSS | 4 | 0.69% | |
| 6 | Vedram | JAP | 4 | 0.69% | |
| 7 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 4 | 0.69% | |
| 8 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 9 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 10 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 11 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | Ramveer | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 13 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 14 | Ritoo | BSCP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 15 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 576 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 328 | 56.55% | 1 | 44 | Strong |
| BJP | 125 | 21.55% | 2 | 418 | Weak |
| BSP | 79 | 13.62% | 3 | 85 | Weak |
| INC | 22 | 3.79% | 4 | 167 | Poor |
| IND | 9 | 1.55% | 5 | 244 | Poor |
| JAP | 4 | 0.69% | 8 | 184 | Poor |
| ASP | 4 | 0.69% | 6 | 31 | Poor |
| BSS | 4 | 0.69% | 7 | 23 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 154 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.