P.P. SEWARAMPURVA M. VIJNA PS 437
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP490 votes at this polling station
over Padamrag Singh Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 490 | 63.39% | |
| 2 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 159 | 20.57% | |
| 3 | Vedram | JAP | 74 | 9.57% | |
| 4 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 19 | 2.46% | |
| 5 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 9 | 1.16% | |
| 6 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 6 | 0.78% | |
| 7 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 4 | 0.52% | |
| 8 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 3 | 0.39% | |
| 9 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 3 | 0.39% | |
| 10 | Ramveer | IND | 3 | 0.39% | |
| 11 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 12 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 13 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Ramesh | BSS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Ritoo | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 773 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 490 | 62.74% | 1 | 6 | Strong |
| SP | 159 | 20.36% | 2 | 247 | Weak |
| JAP | 74 | 9.48% | 3 | 13 | Poor |
| INC | 19 | 2.43% | 4 | 193 | Poor |
| IND | 18 | 2.30% | 5 | 45 | Poor |
| BSP | 9 | 1.15% | 6 | 357 | Poor |
| ASP | 4 | 0.51% | 7 | 30 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 456 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 446 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.