P.P. UMRAULI JAITPUR R.N. 2 PS 432
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP309 votes at this polling station
over Dr. Rahul Tiwari (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 309 | 53.93% | |
| 2 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 146 | 25.48% | |
| 3 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 78 | 13.61% | |
| 4 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 11 | 1.92% | |
| 5 | Ramesh | BSS | 7 | 1.22% | |
| 6 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 7 | 1.22% | |
| 7 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 5 | 0.87% | |
| 8 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 3 | 0.52% | |
| 9 | Ritoo | BSCP | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 10 | Vedram | JAP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 13 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 14 | Ramveer | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 15 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 573 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 309 | 53.55% | 1 | 126 | Strong |
| BSP | 146 | 25.30% | 2 | 23 | Average |
| SP | 78 | 13.52% | 3 | 409 | Weak |
| IND | 18 | 3.12% | 4 | 44 | Poor |
| INC | 11 | 1.91% | 5 | 313 | Poor |
| BSS | 7 | 1.21% | 6 | 6 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.35% | 7 | 53 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 225 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 320 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.