P.P. MANSURPUR R.N.2 PS 428
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP189 votes at this polling station
over Dr. Rahul Tiwari (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 189 | 56.93% | |
| 2 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 57 | 17.17% | |
| 3 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 49 | 14.76% | |
| 4 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 19 | 5.72% | |
| 5 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 13 | 3.92% | |
| 6 | Ramesh | BSS | 2 | 0.60% | |
| 7 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 1 | 0.30% | |
| 8 | Vedram | JAP | 1 | 0.30% | |
| 9 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 1 | 0.30% | |
| 10 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Ramveer | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Ritoo | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 332 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 189 | 56.76% | 1 | 306 | Strong |
| BSP | 57 | 17.12% | 2 | 141 | Weak |
| SP | 49 | 14.71% | 3 | 463 | Weak |
| INC | 19 | 5.71% | 4 | 192 | Poor |
| ASP | 13 | 3.90% | 5 | 2 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.60% | 7 | 461 | Poor |
| BSS | 2 | 0.60% | 6 | 110 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.30% | 8 | 318 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 441 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.