P.P. NAYAGAON PS 392
Padamrag Singh Yadav
SPsp707 votes at this polling station
over Dr. Rahul Tiwari (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 707 | 85.59% | |
| 2 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 84 | 10.17% | |
| 3 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 20 | 2.42% | |
| 4 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 2 | 0.24% | |
| 5 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 2 | 0.24% | |
| 6 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 2 | 0.24% | |
| 7 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 2 | 0.24% | |
| 8 | Vedram | JAP | 2 | 0.24% | |
| 9 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 2 | 0.24% | |
| 10 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 11 | Ramveer | IND | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 12 | Ramesh | BSS | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 13 | Ritoo | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 826 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 707 | 84.98% | 1 | 2 | Strong |
| BSP | 84 | 10.10% | 2 | 79 | Weak |
| BJP | 20 | 2.40% | 3 | 478 | Poor |
| IND | 9 | 1.08% | 4 | 240 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.24% | 6 | 228 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.24% | 5 | 474 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.12% | 7 | 215 | Poor |
| BSS | 1 | 0.12% | 8 | 227 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 414 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.