J.H.S. SHAHABUDDINPUR PS 337
Padamrag Singh Yadav
SPsp483 votes at this polling station
over Madhavendra Pratap Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 483 | 53.55% | |
| 2 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 312 | 34.59% | |
| 3 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 47 | 5.21% | |
| 4 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 39 | 4.32% | |
| 5 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 7 | 0.78% | |
| 6 | Ramveer | IND | 3 | 0.33% | |
| 7 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 3 | 0.33% | |
| 8 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 2 | 0.22% | |
| 9 | Ramesh | BSS | 2 | 0.22% | |
| 10 | Ritoo | BSCP | 1 | 0.11% | |
| 11 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 1 | 0.11% | |
| 12 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 1 | 0.11% | |
| 13 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 1 | 0.11% | |
| 14 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Vedram | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 902 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 483 | 53.37% | 1 | 14 | Strong |
| BJP | 312 | 34.48% | 2 | 121 | Average |
| BSP | 47 | 5.19% | 3 | 172 | Poor |
| INC | 39 | 4.31% | 4 | 85 | Poor |
| IND | 15 | 1.66% | 5 | 83 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.33% | 6 | 50 | Poor |
| BSS | 2 | 0.22% | 7 | 95 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.11% | 8 | 130 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 436 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.