P.P. BAMHTAPUR NANDBAG PS 330
Padamrag Singh Yadav
SPsp236 votes at this polling station
over Madhavendra Pratap Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 236 | 35.98% | |
| 2 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 229 | 34.91% | |
| 3 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 102 | 15.55% | |
| 4 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 40 | 6.10% | |
| 5 | Vedram | JAP | 22 | 3.35% | |
| 6 | Ramesh | BSS | 6 | 0.91% | |
| 7 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 5 | 0.76% | |
| 8 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 3 | 0.46% | |
| 9 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 3 | 0.46% | |
| 10 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 3 | 0.46% | |
| 11 | Ritoo | BSCP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 12 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 13 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 14 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 15 | Ramveer | IND | 1 | 0.15% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 656 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 236 | 35.38% | 1 | 112 | Average |
| BJP | 229 | 34.33% | 2 | 239 | Average |
| BSP | 102 | 15.29% | 3 | 45 | Weak |
| INC | 40 | 6.00% | 4 | 84 | Poor |
| JAP | 22 | 3.30% | 5 | 78 | Poor |
| IND | 16 | 2.40% | 6 | 71 | Poor |
| BSS | 6 | 0.90% | 7 | 7 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.45% | 8 | 49 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.30% | 9 | 45 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.