P.P.KHARAGPUR M. KHASAURA PS 315
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP444 votes at this polling station
over Padamrag Singh Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 444 | 56.56% | |
| 2 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 194 | 24.71% | |
| 3 | Vedram | JAP | 82 | 10.45% | |
| 4 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 31 | 3.95% | |
| 5 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 9 | 1.15% | |
| 6 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 8 | 1.02% | |
| 7 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 5 | 0.64% | |
| 8 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 4 | 0.51% | |
| 9 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 3 | 0.38% | |
| 10 | Ramveer | IND | 2 | 0.25% | |
| 11 | Ritoo | BSCP | 2 | 0.25% | |
| 12 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 13 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Ramesh | BSS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 785 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 444 | 56.49% | 1 | 15 | Strong |
| SP | 194 | 24.68% | 2 | 175 | Weak |
| JAP | 82 | 10.43% | 3 | 12 | Weak |
| BSP | 31 | 3.94% | 4 | 238 | Poor |
| IND | 18 | 2.29% | 5 | 41 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.15% | 6 | 340 | Poor |
| ASP | 5 | 0.64% | 7 | 15 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.25% | 8 | 44 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 401 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.