P.P. PARCHAULI R.N.2 PS 299
Padamrag Singh Yadav
SPsp168 votes at this polling station
over Madhavendra Pratap Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 168 | 41.69% | |
| 2 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 141 | 34.99% | |
| 3 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 59 | 14.64% | |
| 4 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 14 | 3.47% | |
| 5 | Vedram | JAP | 4 | 0.99% | |
| 6 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 4 | 0.99% | |
| 7 | Ramveer | IND | 3 | 0.74% | |
| 8 | Ramesh | BSS | 3 | 0.74% | |
| 9 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 10 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 11 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 12 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 13 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Ritoo | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 403 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 168 | 41.18% | 1 | 223 | Strong |
| BJP | 141 | 34.56% | 2 | 389 | Average |
| BSP | 59 | 14.46% | 3 | 135 | Weak |
| INC | 14 | 3.43% | 4 | 261 | Poor |
| IND | 12 | 2.94% | 5 | 138 | Poor |
| JAP | 4 | 0.98% | 6 | 181 | Poor |
| BSS | 3 | 0.74% | 7 | 39 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.49% | 8 | 91 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 349 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.