P.P. ISMAILPUR PS 297
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP128 votes at this polling station
over Rajvardhan Singh (INC)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 128 | 40.89% | |
| 2 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 87 | 27.80% | |
| 3 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 47 | 15.02% | |
| 4 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 33 | 10.54% | |
| 5 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 6 | 1.92% | |
| 6 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 5 | 1.60% | |
| 7 | Ramveer | IND | 5 | 1.60% | |
| 8 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 1 | 0.32% | |
| 9 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.32% | |
| 10 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Ramesh | BSS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Ritoo | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Vedram | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 313 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 128 | 40.63% | 1 | 414 | Strong |
| INC | 87 | 27.62% | 2 | 18 | Average |
| BSP | 47 | 14.92% | 3 | 171 | Weak |
| SP | 33 | 10.48% | 4 | 474 | Weak |
| IND | 17 | 5.40% | 5 | 52 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.32% | 6 | 193 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 422 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 392 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 348 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.