P.P. GHATWASA R.N.2 PS 290
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP223 votes at this polling station
over Padamrag Singh Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 223 | 48.80% | |
| 2 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 152 | 33.26% | |
| 3 | Vedram | JAP | 30 | 6.56% | |
| 4 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 28 | 6.13% | |
| 5 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 11 | 2.41% | |
| 6 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 3 | 0.66% | |
| 7 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 8 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 9 | Ramesh | BSS | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 10 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 11 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 12 | Ramveer | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 13 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Ritoo | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 457 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 223 | 48.27% | 1 | 247 | Strong |
| SP | 152 | 32.90% | 2 | 267 | Average |
| JAP | 30 | 6.49% | 3 | 58 | Poor |
| BSP | 28 | 6.06% | 4 | 255 | Poor |
| INC | 11 | 2.38% | 5 | 308 | Poor |
| IND | 10 | 2.16% | 6 | 190 | Poor |
| BSS | 2 | 0.43% | 7 | 89 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.22% | 8 | 191 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 343 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.