P.P. ADANIYA M. ARVAL R.N. 2 PS 280
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP138 votes at this polling station
over Dr. Rahul Tiwari (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 138 | 37.60% | |
| 2 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 119 | 32.43% | |
| 3 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 83 | 22.62% | |
| 4 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 17 | 4.63% | |
| 5 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 3 | 0.82% | |
| 6 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 2 | 0.54% | |
| 7 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 8 | Ramveer | IND | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 9 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 10 | Ramesh | BSS | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 11 | Vedram | JAP | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 12 | Ritoo | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 367 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 138 | 37.40% | 1 | 395 | Average |
| BSP | 119 | 32.25% | 2 | 34 | Average |
| SP | 83 | 22.49% | 3 | 390 | Weak |
| INC | 17 | 4.61% | 4 | 210 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 1.63% | 5 | 346 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.54% | 6 | 89 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.27% | 8 | 286 | Poor |
| BSS | 1 | 0.27% | 7 | 195 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 335 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.