P.P. KUDHA PS 252
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP144 votes at this polling station
over Dr. Rahul Tiwari (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 144 | 52.36% | |
| 2 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 74 | 26.91% | |
| 3 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 36 | 13.09% | |
| 4 | Vedram | JAP | 11 | 4.00% | |
| 5 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 7 | 2.55% | |
| 6 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 1 | 0.36% | |
| 7 | Ramesh | BSS | 1 | 0.36% | |
| 8 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 1 | 0.36% | |
| 9 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Ritoo | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Ramveer | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 275 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 144 | 51.99% | 1 | 386 | Strong |
| BSP | 74 | 26.71% | 2 | 92 | Average |
| SP | 36 | 13.00% | 3 | 472 | Weak |
| JAP | 11 | 3.97% | 4 | 120 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 2.53% | 5 | 380 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.36% | 8 | 469 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.36% | 6 | 177 | Poor |
| BSS | 1 | 0.36% | 7 | 190 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 315 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.