P.P. GHASO PS 24
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP439 votes at this polling station
over Padamrag Singh Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 439 | 72.80% | |
| 2 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 84 | 13.93% | |
| 3 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 48 | 7.96% | |
| 4 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 12 | 1.99% | |
| 5 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 7 | 1.16% | |
| 6 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 5 | 0.83% | |
| 7 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 8 | Ritoo | BSCP | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 9 | Vedram | JAP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | Ramesh | BSS | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | Ramveer | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 13 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 603 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 439 | 72.32% | 1 | 18 | Strong |
| SP | 84 | 13.84% | 2 | 387 | Weak |
| BSP | 48 | 7.91% | 3 | 167 | Poor |
| IND | 15 | 2.47% | 4 | 77 | Poor |
| INC | 12 | 1.98% | 5 | 281 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.33% | 6 | 21 | Poor |
| BSS | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 122 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.16% | 7 | 118 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 240 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.