P.P. MAHREPUR R.N.2 PS 230
Padamrag Singh Yadav
SPsp193 votes at this polling station
over Madhavendra Pratap Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 193 | 38.37% | |
| 2 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 179 | 35.59% | |
| 3 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 99 | 19.68% | |
| 4 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 21 | 4.17% | |
| 5 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 5 | 0.99% | |
| 6 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 7 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 8 | Vedram | JAP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 9 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 10 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Ramveer | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Ramesh | BSS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Ritoo | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 503 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 193 | 37.92% | 1 | 177 | Average |
| BJP | 179 | 35.17% | 2 | 335 | Average |
| BSP | 99 | 19.45% | 3 | 50 | Weak |
| INC | 21 | 4.13% | 4 | 170 | Poor |
| IND | 9 | 1.77% | 5 | 220 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.20% | 7 | 278 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.20% | 6 | 170 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 358 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 296 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.