P.P. CHANDARSIPUR PS 227
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP221 votes at this polling station
over Dr. Rahul Tiwari (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 221 | 42.66% | |
| 2 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 92 | 17.76% | |
| 3 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 88 | 16.99% | |
| 4 | Vedram | JAP | 63 | 12.16% | |
| 5 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 36 | 6.95% | |
| 6 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 5 | 0.97% | |
| 7 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 4 | 0.77% | |
| 8 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 9 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 10 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 11 | Ritoo | BSCP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 12 | Ramveer | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 13 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Ramesh | BSS | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 518 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 221 | 42.50% | 1 | 254 | Strong |
| BSP | 92 | 17.69% | 2 | 61 | Weak |
| SP | 88 | 16.92% | 3 | 383 | Weak |
| JAP | 63 | 12.12% | 4 | 21 | Weak |
| INC | 36 | 6.92% | 5 | 99 | Poor |
| IND | 14 | 2.69% | 6 | 104 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.38% | 7 | 81 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.38% | 8 | 38 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 356 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.