P.P. RAMPUR LALJI PS 220
Dr. Rahul Tiwari
BSPBSP177 votes at this polling station
over Padamrag Singh Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 177 | 40.97% | |
| 2 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 141 | 32.64% | |
| 3 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 78 | 18.06% | |
| 4 | Vedram | JAP | 20 | 4.63% | |
| 5 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 7 | 1.62% | |
| 6 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 3 | 0.69% | |
| 7 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 8 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 9 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 10 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 11 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Ramveer | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Ramesh | BSS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Ritoo | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 432 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 177 | 40.69% | 1 | 13 | Strong |
| SP | 141 | 32.41% | 2 | 290 | Average |
| BJP | 78 | 17.93% | 3 | 455 | Weak |
| JAP | 20 | 4.60% | 4 | 80 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 1.61% | 5 | 376 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 1.38% | 6 | 338 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.69% | 7 | 44 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 291 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 352 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.