P.P. MIRKAPUR PS 210
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP207 votes at this polling station
over Dr. Rahul Tiwari (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 207 | 58.64% | |
| 2 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 55 | 15.58% | |
| 3 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 39 | 11.05% | |
| 4 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 29 | 8.22% | |
| 5 | Vedram | JAP | 7 | 1.98% | |
| 6 | Ramveer | IND | 3 | 0.85% | |
| 7 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 2 | 0.57% | |
| 8 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 2 | 0.57% | |
| 9 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 2 | 0.57% | |
| 10 | Ramesh | BSS | 2 | 0.57% | |
| 11 | Ritoo | BSCP | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 12 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 13 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 14 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 15 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 1 | 0.28% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 353 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 207 | 61.06% | 1 | 278 | Strong |
| BSP | 55 | 16.22% | 2 | 146 | Weak |
| SP | 39 | 11.50% | 3 | 470 | Weak |
| INC | 29 | 8.55% | 4 | 123 | Poor |
| IND | 12 | 3.54% | 5 | 135 | Poor |
| JAP | 7 | 2.06% | 6 | 142 | Poor |
| BSS | 2 | 0.59% | 7 | 77 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.29% | 9 | 112 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.29% | 8 | 163 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.