P.P. BADAURA PS 200
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP380 votes at this polling station
over Padamrag Singh Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 380 | 48.53% | |
| 2 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 216 | 27.59% | |
| 3 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 76 | 9.71% | |
| 4 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 70 | 8.94% | |
| 5 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 12 | 1.53% | |
| 6 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 6 | 0.77% | |
| 7 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 6 | 0.77% | |
| 8 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 3 | 0.38% | |
| 9 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 3 | 0.38% | |
| 10 | Ramveer | IND | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 11 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 12 | Ramesh | BSS | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 13 | Ritoo | BSCP | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 14 | Vedram | JAP | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 15 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 1 | 0.13% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 783 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 380 | 48.04% | 1 | 45 | Strong |
| SP | 216 | 27.31% | 2 | 139 | Average |
| INC | 76 | 9.61% | 3 | 23 | Poor |
| BSP | 70 | 8.85% | 4 | 98 | Poor |
| IND | 29 | 3.67% | 5 | 7 | Poor |
| ASP | 6 | 0.76% | 6 | 7 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.25% | 9 | 218 | Poor |
| BSS | 2 | 0.25% | 8 | 74 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.25% | 7 | 36 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.