P.P. BASELIYA PS 162
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP472 votes at this polling station
over Padamrag Singh Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 472 | 74.10% | |
| 2 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 80 | 12.56% | |
| 3 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 23 | 3.61% | |
| 4 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 21 | 3.30% | |
| 5 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 8 | 1.26% | |
| 6 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 7 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 8 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 9 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 10 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 11 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 12 | Ramesh | BSS | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 13 | Ritoo | BSCP | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 14 | Vedram | JAP | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 15 | Ramveer | IND | 3 | 0.47% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 637 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 472 | 73.07% | 1 | 7 | Strong |
| SP | 80 | 12.38% | 2 | 401 | Weak |
| IND | 28 | 4.33% | 3 | 8 | Poor |
| INC | 23 | 3.56% | 4 | 157 | Poor |
| BSP | 21 | 3.25% | 5 | 282 | Poor |
| ASP | 4 | 0.62% | 6 | 24 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.46% | 9 | 191 | Poor |
| BSS | 3 | 0.46% | 8 | 34 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 0.46% | 7 | 11 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.