P.P. PANDEYPUR R.N.1 PS 155
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP264 votes at this polling station
over Rajvardhan Singh (INC)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 264 | 58.15% | |
| 2 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 88 | 19.38% | |
| 3 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 45 | 9.91% | |
| 4 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 15 | 3.30% | |
| 5 | Vedram | JAP | 13 | 2.86% | |
| 6 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 8 | 1.76% | |
| 7 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 6 | 1.32% | |
| 8 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 5 | 1.10% | |
| 9 | Ritoo | BSCP | 3 | 0.66% | |
| 10 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 11 | Ramveer | IND | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 12 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 13 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 14 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Ramesh | BSS | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 454 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 264 | 57.39% | 1 | 183 | Strong |
| INC | 88 | 19.13% | 2 | 16 | Weak |
| SP | 45 | 9.78% | 3 | 466 | Poor |
| IND | 21 | 4.57% | 4 | 24 | Poor |
| BSP | 15 | 3.26% | 5 | 312 | Poor |
| JAP | 13 | 2.83% | 6 | 106 | Poor |
| ASP | 5 | 1.09% | 7 | 14 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 0.65% | 8 | 10 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 323 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.