P.P. AMIRTA PS 132
Madhavendra Pratap Singh
BJPBJP390 votes at this polling station
over Rajvardhan Singh (INC)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 390 | 56.52% | |
| 2 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 91 | 13.19% | |
| 3 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 82 | 11.88% | |
| 4 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 69 | 10.00% | |
| 5 | Vedram | JAP | 25 | 3.62% | |
| 6 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 10 | 1.45% | |
| 7 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 7 | 1.01% | |
| 8 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 7 | 1.01% | |
| 9 | Ramveer | IND | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 10 | Ritoo | BSCP | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 11 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 13 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 14 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 15 | Ramesh | BSS | 1 | 0.14% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 690 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 390 | 56.44% | 1 | 35 | Strong |
| INC | 91 | 13.17% | 2 | 12 | Weak |
| BSP | 82 | 11.87% | 3 | 82 | Weak |
| SP | 69 | 9.99% | 4 | 431 | Poor |
| JAP | 25 | 3.62% | 5 | 66 | Poor |
| IND | 23 | 3.33% | 6 | 17 | Poor |
| ASP | 7 | 1.01% | 7 | 6 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.29% | 8 | 33 | Poor |
| BSS | 1 | 0.14% | 9 | 156 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.