P.P.RATNAPUR PS 129
Padamrag Singh Yadav
SPsp257 votes at this polling station
over Madhavendra Pratap Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Padamrag Singh Yadav | SP | 257 | 47.50% | |
| 2 | Madhavendra Pratap Singh | BJP | 137 | 25.32% | |
| 3 | Dr. Rahul Tiwari | BSP | 66 | 12.20% | |
| 4 | Vedram | JAP | 27 | 4.99% | |
| 5 | Ramesh | BSS | 26 | 4.81% | |
| 6 | Rajvardhan Singh | INC | 13 | 2.40% | |
| 7 | Gyanesh Kumar | ASP | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 8 | Manoj Kumar | IND | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 9 | Lal Bahadur Singh | IND | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 10 | Raj Prakash Singh | IND | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 11 | Suraj Prakash | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 12 | Anupam Pratap Singh | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 13 | Umesh Chandra Pathak | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 14 | Ritoo | BSCP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 15 | Ramveer | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 541 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 257 | 47.24% | 1 | 89 | Strong |
| BJP | 137 | 25.18% | 2 | 397 | Average |
| BSP | 66 | 12.13% | 3 | 111 | Weak |
| JAP | 27 | 4.96% | 4 | 61 | Poor |
| BSS | 26 | 4.78% | 5 | 1 | Poor |
| INC | 13 | 2.39% | 6 | 273 | Poor |
| IND | 11 | 2.02% | 7 | 156 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.55% | 8 | 40 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.18% | 9 | 91 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 154, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.