PANCHAYAT GHAR R.N.2 ASHOKPUR H/O FATTEPUR PS 100
Manoj Kumar Rajvanshi
COL 2727321 votes at this polling station
over Ramkrishna Bhargava (COL 12)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manoj Kumar Rajvanshi | COL 27 | 321 | 43.67% | |
| 2 | Ramkrishna Bhargava | COL 12 | 261 | 35.51% | |
| 3 | Shyam Kishor | COL 15 | 77 | 10.48% | |
| 4 | Dharmendra Dhangar | COL 21 | 40 | 5.44% | |
| 5 | Manoj Kumar | COL 39 | 13 | 1.77% | |
| 6 | Baburam Verma | COL 24 | 8 | 1.09% | |
| 7 | Vijay Prakash Gautam | COL 30 | 6 | 0.82% | |
| 8 | Subhash Rajvanshi | COL 18 | 4 | 0.54% | |
| 9 | Suneeta | COL 42 | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 10 | Nota | COL 45 | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 11 | Santosh | COL 33 | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | Pradeep Kumar Rajvanshi | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 735 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 27 | 321 | 43.67% | 1 | 34 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 261 | 35.51% | 2 | 134 | Average |
| COL 15 | 77 | 10.48% | 3 | 191 | Weak |
| COL 21 | 40 | 5.44% | 4 | 23 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 13 | 1.77% | 5 | 93 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 8 | 1.09% | 6 | 28 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 6 | 0.82% | 7 | 44 | Poor |
| COL 18 | 4 | 0.54% | 8 | 164 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 2 | 0.27% | 9 | 149 | Poor |
| COL 45 | 2 | 0.27% | 10 | 276 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 1 | 0.14% | 11 | 157 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 277 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 153, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.