प्रा०वि० जयपालपुर क०न०-2 PS 417
Pushpendra Kumar or Dr.Pushpendra pasi
BSPBahujan Samaj Party289 votes at this polling station
over Dr.Hargovind Bhargava (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pushpendra Kumar or Dr.Pushpendra pasi | BSP | 289 | 37.68% | |
| 2 | Dr.Hargovind Bhargava | SP | 276 | 35.98% | |
| 3 | Manish Rawat | BJP | 175 | 22.82% | |
| 4 | Kamla Rawat | INC | 7 | 0.91% | |
| 5 | Kanhiya Lal | AAP | 5 | 0.65% | |
| 6 | Sunita Rawat | IND | 4 | 0.52% | |
| 7 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 0.52% | |
| 8 | Imarti Lal | IND | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 9 | Satish Kumar Bhargava | IND | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 10 | Rajkaran | VPI | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 11 | Virendra Kumar | SRP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 12 | Aditya Prakash | IND | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 13 | Mahendra Kumar Rawat | ASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 767 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 289 | 37.68% | 1 | 1 | Average |
| SP | 276 | 35.98% | 2 | 3 | Average |
| BJP | 175 | 22.82% | 3 | 9 | Weak |
| IND | 9 | 1.17% | 4 | 2 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 0.91% | 5 | 4 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 0.65% | 6 | 1 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 0.52% | 7 | 5 | Poor |
| SRP | 1 | 0.13% | 8 | 5 | Poor |
| VPI | 1 | 0.13% | 9 | 4 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 9 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 152, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.