3 PS 2
NOTA
NANNone of the above (NOTA)57 votes at this polling station
over VINOD KUMAR (COL 36)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NOTA | NAN | 57 | 20.21% | |
| 2 | VINOD KUMAR | COL 36 | 37 | 13.12% | |
| 3 | RAGHUNANDAN | COL 33 | 34 | 12.06% | |
| 4 | DEEP KUMAR | COL 30 | 31 | 10.99% | |
| 5 | RAJ KUMAR GUPTA | COL 27 | 28 | 9.93% | |
| 6 | MAYA VERMA | COL 24 | 25 | 8.87% | |
| 7 | MEESAM AMMAR RIZVI | COL 21 | 22 | 7.80% | |
| 8 | NARENDRA SINGH VERMA | COL 18 | 19 | 6.74% | |
| 9 | USHA VERMA | COL 15 | 16 | 5.67% | |
| 10 | ASHA MAURYA | COL 12 | 13 | 4.61% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 282 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAN | 57 | 712.50% | 1 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 36 | 37 | 462.50% | 2 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 33 | 34 | 425.00% | 3 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 30 | 31 | 387.50% | 4 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 27 | 28 | 350.00% | 5 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 24 | 25 | 312.50% | 6 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 21 | 22 | 275.00% | 7 | 334 | Strong |
| COL 18 | 19 | 237.50% | 8 | 403 | Strong |
| COL 15 | 16 | 200.00% | 9 | 2 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 13 | 162.50% | 10 | 395 | Strong |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 151, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.