P.S. AMBARPUR PS 59
Afzaal Kausar
COL 1212556 votes at this polling station
over Nirmal Verma (COL 15)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Afzaal Kausar | COL 12 | 556 | 69.41% | |
| 2 | Nirmal Verma | COL 15 | 165 | 20.60% | |
| 3 | Hashim Ali | COL 21 | 53 | 6.62% | |
| 4 | Vandana Bharrgava | COL 18 | 14 | 1.75% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 7 | 0.87% | |
| 6 | Sahajram | COL 45 | 4 | 0.50% | |
| 7 | Shashikala Verma | COL 39 | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 8 | Ramlakhan Gautam | COL 30 | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 9 | Nattharam | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Riazuddin "Razu" | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Salil Seth | COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Adarsh | COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Ram Kishor Verma | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 801 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 12 | 556 | 69.41% | 1 | 12 | Strong |
| COL 15 | 165 | 20.60% | 2 | 294 | Weak |
| COL 21 | 53 | 6.62% | 3 | 159 | Poor |
| COL 18 | 14 | 1.75% | 4 | 86 | Poor |
| NOTA | 7 | 0.87% | 5 | 44 | Poor |
| COL 45 | 4 | 0.50% | 6 | 48 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 1 | 0.12% | 7 | 177 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 1 | 0.12% | 8 | 99 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 327 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 217 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 192 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 261 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 210 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 149, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.