P.S. PURAINA PS 349
Hashim Ali
COL 2121140 votes at this polling station
over Nirmal Verma (COL 15)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hashim Ali | COL 21 | 140 | 56.45% | |
| 2 | Nirmal Verma | COL 15 | 48 | 19.35% | |
| 3 | Afzaal Kausar | COL 12 | 43 | 17.34% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 1.61% | |
| 5 | Vandana Bharrgava | COL 18 | 3 | 1.21% | |
| 6 | Ramlakhan Gautam | COL 30 | 3 | 1.21% | |
| 7 | Adarsh | COL 24 | 2 | 0.81% | |
| 8 | Ram Kishor Verma | COL 27 | 1 | 0.40% | |
| 9 | Nattharam | COL 33 | 1 | 0.40% | |
| 10 | Shashikala Verma | COL 39 | 1 | 0.40% | |
| 11 | Salil Seth | COL 42 | 1 | 0.40% | |
| 12 | Sahajram | COL 45 | 1 | 0.40% | |
| 13 | Riazuddin "Razu" | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 248 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 140 | 56.45% | 1 | 35 | Strong |
| COL 15 | 48 | 19.35% | 2 | 377 | Weak |
| COL 12 | 43 | 17.34% | 3 | 390 | Weak |
| NOTA | 4 | 1.61% | 4 | 184 | Poor |
| COL 18 | 3 | 1.21% | 5 | 324 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 3 | 1.21% | 6 | 75 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 2 | 0.81% | 7 | 126 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 1 | 0.40% | 8 | 160 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 1 | 0.40% | 9 | 166 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 1 | 0.40% | 10 | 164 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 1 | 0.40% | 11 | 307 | Poor |
| COL 45 | 1 | 0.40% | 12 | 284 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 365 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 149, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.