MUSLIM JHS SHEKHSARAIN ROOM NO-1 PS 60
Radhey Shyam Jaiswal
SPSamajwadi Party409 votes at this polling station
over Rakesh Rathour (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Radhey Shyam Jaiswal | SP | 409 | 91.91% | |
| 2 | Rakesh Rathour | BJP | 20 | 4.49% | |
| 3 | Khurshid Ansari | BSP | 6 | 1.35% | |
| 4 | Shamina Shafiq | INC | 6 | 1.35% | |
| 5 | Azaan | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 6 | Rakesh | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 7 | Rupendra Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 8 | NOTA | NA | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 9 | Saket Mishra | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Dinesh Kumar Jaiswal | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Pankaj Mishra | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Anand Jaiswal | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Dr. Babu Ram Gautam | AIPFR | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Ramshankar | SDU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Satyendra Kumar | BSS | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 445 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 409 | 91.91% | 1 | 3 | Strong |
| BJP | 20 | 4.49% | 2 | 17 | Poor |
| BSP | 6 | 1.35% | 3 | 16 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.35% | 4 | 4 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.67% | 5 | 17 | Poor |
| NA | 1 | 0.22% | 6 | 11 | Poor |
| SDU | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 6 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 11 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 11 | Poor |
| AIPFR | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 8 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 146, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.