PS RAIPUR ROOM NO-2 PS 466
Radhey Shyam Jaiswal
SPSamajwadi Party157 votes at this polling station
over Khurshid Ansari (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Radhey Shyam Jaiswal | SP | 157 | 60.15% | |
| 2 | Khurshid Ansari | BSP | 58 | 22.22% | |
| 3 | Rakesh Rathour | BJP | 32 | 12.26% | |
| 4 | Saket Mishra | IND | 5 | 1.92% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.77% | |
| 6 | Azaan | IND | 2 | 0.77% | |
| 7 | Dinesh Kumar Jaiswal | IND | 1 | 0.38% | |
| 8 | Dr. Babu Ram Gautam | AIPFR | 1 | 0.38% | |
| 9 | Shamina Shafiq | INC | 1 | 0.38% | |
| 10 | Rakesh | IND | 1 | 0.38% | |
| 11 | Rupendra Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.38% | |
| 12 | Anand Jaiswal | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Ramshankar | SDU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Satyendra Kumar | BSS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Pankaj Mishra | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 261 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 157 | 60.15% | 1 | 8 | Strong |
| BSP | 58 | 22.22% | 2 | 3 | Weak |
| BJP | 32 | 12.26% | 3 | 15 | Weak |
| IND | 10 | 3.83% | 4 | 14 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.77% | 5 | 1 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.38% | 7 | 15 | Poor |
| AIPFR | 1 | 0.38% | 6 | 6 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 17 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 17 | Poor |
| SDU | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 17 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 146, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.