P.S. KOPA PS 400
Mohan Bajpai
BSPBSP322 votes at this polling station
over Yogesh Verma (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mohan Bajpai | BSP | 322 | 47.63% | |
| 2 | Yogesh Verma | BJP | 181 | 26.78% | |
| 3 | Utkarsh Verma Madhur | SP | 158 | 23.37% | |
| 4 | Dr. RaviShankar Trivedi | INC | 6 | 0.89% | |
| 5 | Dr. Ram Ji Sharma Advocate | RLP | 4 | 0.59% | |
| 6 | Reetu Verma Didi | LJP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 7 | Janardan Prasad J.P.Mishra | CPI | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 8 | Mo. Usman Siddiqui | AIMIM | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 9 | Khushi Kinnar | AAPP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Nawal Kishor | BSWBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Ashraf Ali Advocate | PECP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Naresh Singh Bhadauriya | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 676 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 322 | 47.28% | 1 | 1 | Strong |
| BJP | 181 | 26.58% | 2 | 372 | Average |
| SP | 158 | 23.20% | 3 | 290 | Weak |
| INC | 6 | 0.88% | 4 | 192 | Poor |
| RLP | 4 | 0.59% | 5 | 80 | Poor |
| LJP | 2 | 0.29% | 7 | 121 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.29% | 6 | 246 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 1 | 0.15% | 8 | 282 | Poor |
| AAPP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 446 | Poor |
| BSWBP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 437 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 447 | Poor |
| PECP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 431 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 142, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.