U.P.S. RANGEELANAGAR ROOM NO.-1 PS 338
Utkarsh Verma Madhur
SPSP452 votes at this polling station
over Yogesh Verma (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Utkarsh Verma Madhur | SP | 452 | 64.39% | |
| 2 | Yogesh Verma | BJP | 207 | 29.49% | |
| 3 | Mohan Bajpai | BSP | 22 | 3.13% | |
| 4 | Dr. RaviShankar Trivedi | INC | 8 | 1.14% | |
| 5 | Janardan Prasad J.P.Mishra | CPI | 4 | 0.57% | |
| 6 | Mo. Usman Siddiqui | AIMIM | 3 | 0.43% | |
| 7 | Dr. Ram Ji Sharma Advocate | RLP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 8 | Reetu Verma Didi | LJP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 9 | Naresh Singh Bhadauriya | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 10 | Khushi Kinnar | AAPP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | Ashraf Ali Advocate | PECP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | Nawal Kishor | BSWBP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 702 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 452 | 63.66% | 1 | 32 | Strong |
| BJP | 207 | 29.15% | 2 | 347 | Average |
| BSP | 22 | 3.10% | 3 | 318 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 1.13% | 4 | 121 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.56% | 5 | 97 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 3 | 0.42% | 6 | 111 | Poor |
| RLP | 2 | 0.28% | 7 | 196 | Poor |
| AAPP | 1 | 0.14% | 8 | 263 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.14% | 9 | 256 | Poor |
| LJP | 1 | 0.14% | 10 | 241 | Poor |
| PECP | 1 | 0.14% | 11 | 162 | Poor |
| BSWBP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 424 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 142, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.