P.S. KATIA PS 133
Yogesh Verma
BJPBJP379 votes at this polling station
over Utkarsh Verma Madhur (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yogesh Verma | BJP | 379 | 44.59% | |
| 2 | Utkarsh Verma Madhur | SP | 363 | 42.71% | |
| 3 | Mohan Bajpai | BSP | 83 | 9.76% | |
| 4 | Nawal Kishor | BSWBP | 9 | 1.06% | |
| 5 | Dr. RaviShankar Trivedi | INC | 6 | 0.71% | |
| 6 | Khushi Kinnar | AAPP | 3 | 0.35% | |
| 7 | Janardan Prasad J.P.Mishra | CPI | 2 | 0.24% | |
| 8 | Dr. Ram Ji Sharma Advocate | RLP | 2 | 0.24% | |
| 9 | Reetu Verma Didi | LJP | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 10 | Naresh Singh Bhadauriya | IND | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 11 | Ashraf Ali Advocate | PECP | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 12 | Mo. Usman Siddiqui | AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 850 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 379 | 44.43% | 1 | 89 | Strong |
| SP | 363 | 42.56% | 2 | 79 | Strong |
| BSP | 83 | 9.73% | 3 | 91 | Poor |
| BSWBP | 9 | 1.06% | 4 | 2 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 0.70% | 5 | 173 | Poor |
| AAPP | 3 | 0.35% | 6 | 67 | Poor |
| RLP | 2 | 0.23% | 8 | 163 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.23% | 7 | 199 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.12% | 9 | 196 | Poor |
| LJP | 1 | 0.12% | 10 | 180 | Poor |
| PECP | 1 | 0.12% | 11 | 114 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 356 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 142, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.