P.S. MATHNA PS 1
Yogesh Verma
BJPBJP289 votes at this polling station
over Utkarsh Verma Madhur (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yogesh Verma | BJP | 289 | 53.72% | |
| 2 | Utkarsh Verma Madhur | SP | 180 | 33.46% | |
| 3 | Mohan Bajpai | BSP | 43 | 7.99% | |
| 4 | Dr. RaviShankar Trivedi | INC | 9 | 1.67% | |
| 5 | Janardan Prasad J.P.Mishra | CPI | 4 | 0.74% | |
| 6 | Dr. Ram Ji Sharma Advocate | RLP | 4 | 0.74% | |
| 7 | Reetu Verma Didi | LJP | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 8 | Naresh Singh Bhadauriya | IND | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 9 | Mo. Usman Siddiqui | AIMIM | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 10 | Khushi Kinnar | AAPP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Nawal Kishor | BSWBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Ashraf Ali Advocate | PECP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 538 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 289 | 53.03% | 1 | 216 | Strong |
| SP | 180 | 33.03% | 2 | 266 | Average |
| BSP | 43 | 7.89% | 3 | 192 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.65% | 4 | 69 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.73% | 5 | 77 | Poor |
| RLP | 4 | 0.73% | 6 | 53 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.55% | 8 | 37 | Poor |
| LJP | 3 | 0.55% | 9 | 37 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 3 | 0.55% | 7 | 84 | Poor |
| AAPP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 281 | Poor |
| BSWBP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 261 | Poor |
| PECP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 202 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 142, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.