mPp izkFkfed fo|ky; vlnuxj etjk Hk.Mwjk PS 359
Saurabh
RLDRLD597 votes at this polling station
over Kapil Dev Agarwal (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saurabh | RLD | 597 | 87.41% | |
| 2 | Kapil Dev Agarwal | BJP | 35 | 5.12% | |
| 3 | Mohammed Intezar | AIMIM | 29 | 4.25% | |
| 4 | Rahul Kumar Jain | IND | 7 | 1.02% | |
| 5 | Subodh Sharma | INC | 5 | 0.73% | |
| 6 | Abha Sharma | AAP | 4 | 0.59% | |
| 7 | Dharmendra Kumar | IND | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 8 | Raj Kishor Garg | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 9 | Samay Singh | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | Puspankar Deepak | BSP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | Parvez Alam | AKR | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | Rajnish | RSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Krishan pal | BLSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Neeraj Goyal | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Lalit Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 683 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD | 597 | 87.41% | 1 | 50 | Strong |
| BJP | 35 | 5.12% | 2 | 284 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 29 | 4.25% | 3 | 47 | Poor |
| IND | 11 | 1.61% | 4 | 65 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.73% | 5 | 153 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.59% | 6 | 34 | Poor |
| BSP | 1 | 0.15% | 8 | 321 | Poor |
| AKR | 1 | 0.15% | 7 | 197 | Poor |
| BLSP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 358 | Poor |
| RSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 358 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 14, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.