mPp izkFkfed fo|ky; ¼1&8½ ef[k;kyh dejk u0&5 PS 342
Puspankar Deepak
BSPBSP225 votes at this polling station
over Kapil Dev Agarwal (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Puspankar Deepak | BSP | 225 | 39.47% | |
| 2 | Kapil Dev Agarwal | BJP | 194 | 34.04% | |
| 3 | Saurabh | RLD | 138 | 24.21% | |
| 4 | Samay Singh | IND | 4 | 0.70% | |
| 5 | Raj Kishor Garg | IND | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 6 | Parvez Alam | AKR | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 7 | Mohammed Intezar | AIMIM | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 8 | Abha Sharma | AAP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 9 | Subodh Sharma | INC | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 10 | Rahul Kumar Jain | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 11 | Lalit Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Krishan pal | BLSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Rajnish | RSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Dharmendra Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Neeraj Goyal | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 570 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 225 | 39.40% | 1 | 14 | Average |
| BJP | 194 | 33.98% | 2 | 232 | Average |
| RLD | 138 | 24.17% | 3 | 179 | Weak |
| IND | 7 | 1.23% | 4 | 107 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 2 | 0.35% | 5 | 186 | Poor |
| AKR | 2 | 0.35% | 6 | 112 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.18% | 7 | 237 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 339 | Poor |
| BLSP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 347 | Poor |
| RSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 350 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 14, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.