,l0Mh0 bathuh;jhax dkWfyt d0 ua0 3 eqt¶Qjuxj PS 313
Kapil Dev Agarwal
BJPBJP278 votes at this polling station
over Puspankar Deepak (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kapil Dev Agarwal | BJP | 278 | 47.12% | |
| 2 | Puspankar Deepak | BSP | 173 | 29.32% | |
| 3 | Saurabh | RLD | 114 | 19.32% | |
| 4 | Parvez Alam | AKR | 16 | 2.71% | |
| 5 | Subodh Sharma | INC | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 6 | Rahul Kumar Jain | IND | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 7 | Lalit Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 8 | Neeraj Goyal | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 9 | Abha Sharma | AAP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | Rajnish | RSP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | Dharmendra Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mohammed Intezar | AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Krishan pal | BLSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Raj Kishor Garg | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Samay Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 590 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 278 | 46.80% | 1 | 200 | Strong |
| BSP | 173 | 29.12% | 2 | 17 | Average |
| RLD | 114 | 19.19% | 3 | 195 | Weak |
| AKR | 16 | 2.69% | 4 | 7 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.67% | 5 | 176 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.51% | 6 | 240 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.17% | 7 | 233 | Poor |
| RSP | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 122 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 349 | Poor |
| BLSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 331 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 14, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.