tSu dU;k ih0th0dkyst dejk uacj 13 esjB jksM PS 31
Saurabh
RLDRLD550 votes at this polling station
over Kapil Dev Agarwal (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saurabh | RLD | 550 | 87.86% | |
| 2 | Kapil Dev Agarwal | BJP | 32 | 5.11% | |
| 3 | Mohammed Intezar | AIMIM | 27 | 4.31% | |
| 4 | Dharmendra Kumar | IND | 5 | 0.80% | |
| 5 | Subodh Sharma | INC | 4 | 0.64% | |
| 6 | Abha Sharma | AAP | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 7 | Parvez Alam | AKR | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 8 | Puspankar Deepak | BSP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | Neeraj Goyal | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | Rahul Kumar Jain | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | Lalit Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Samay Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Raj Kishor Garg | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Krishan pal | BLSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Rajnish | RSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 626 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD | 550 | 87.86% | 1 | 66 | Strong |
| BJP | 32 | 5.11% | 2 | 286 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 27 | 4.31% | 3 | 49 | Poor |
| IND | 7 | 1.12% | 4 | 100 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.64% | 5 | 158 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.48% | 6 | 36 | Poor |
| AKR | 2 | 0.32% | 7 | 85 | Poor |
| BSP | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 282 | Poor |
| BLSP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 135 | Poor |
| RSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 160 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 14, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.