Mh0,0oh0 b.Vj dkfyt dejk ua0&3 PS 3
Kapil Dev Agarwal
BJPBJP233 votes at this polling station
over Saurabh (RLD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kapil Dev Agarwal | BJP | 233 | 53.94% | |
| 2 | Saurabh | RLD | 182 | 42.13% | |
| 3 | Mohammed Intezar | AIMIM | 6 | 1.39% | |
| 4 | Puspankar Deepak | BSP | 3 | 0.69% | |
| 5 | Subodh Sharma | INC | 3 | 0.69% | |
| 6 | Parvez Alam | AKR | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 7 | Dharmendra Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 8 | Rahul Kumar Jain | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 9 | Lalit Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 10 | Samay Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Neeraj Goyal | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Raj Kishor Garg | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Krishan pal | BLSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Rajnish | RSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Abha Sharma | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 432 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 233 | 53.81% | 1 | 213 | Strong |
| RLD | 182 | 42.03% | 2 | 163 | Strong |
| AIMIM | 6 | 1.39% | 3 | 141 | Poor |
| BSP | 3 | 0.69% | 4 | 204 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.69% | 5 | 202 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.69% | 6 | 181 | Poor |
| AKR | 2 | 0.46% | 7 | 81 | Poor |
| BLSP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 113 | Poor |
| RSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 136 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 242 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 14, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.