mPp izkFkfed fo|ky; ¼1&8½ dwdMk dejk ua0&3 PS 290
Saurabh
RLDRLD581 votes at this polling station
over Mohammed Intezar (AIMIM)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saurabh | RLD | 581 | 87.50% | |
| 2 | Mohammed Intezar | AIMIM | 38 | 5.72% | |
| 3 | Kapil Dev Agarwal | BJP | 13 | 1.96% | |
| 4 | Puspankar Deepak | BSP | 7 | 1.05% | |
| 5 | Dharmendra Kumar | IND | 6 | 0.90% | |
| 6 | Subodh Sharma | INC | 4 | 0.60% | |
| 7 | Abha Sharma | AAP | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 8 | Parvez Alam | AKR | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 9 | Neeraj Goyal | IND | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 10 | Raj Kishor Garg | IND | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 11 | Rahul Kumar Jain | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | Lalit Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 13 | Samay Singh | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 14 | Krishan pal | BLSP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 15 | Rajnish | RSP | 1 | 0.15% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 664 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD | 581 | 86.85% | 1 | 57 | Strong |
| AIMIM | 38 | 5.68% | 2 | 19 | Poor |
| BJP | 13 | 1.94% | 3 | 321 | Poor |
| IND | 13 | 1.94% | 4 | 43 | Poor |
| BSP | 7 | 1.05% | 5 | 152 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.60% | 6 | 191 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.45% | 7 | 56 | Poor |
| AKR | 3 | 0.45% | 8 | 80 | Poor |
| BLSP | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 94 | Poor |
| RSP | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 114 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 14, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.