izk0 fo0 dwdMk ua02 dejk ua0&3 PS 287
Saurabh
RLDRLD206 votes at this polling station
over Puspankar Deepak (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saurabh | RLD | 206 | 40.71% | |
| 2 | Puspankar Deepak | BSP | 172 | 33.99% | |
| 3 | Kapil Dev Agarwal | BJP | 91 | 17.98% | |
| 4 | Mohammed Intezar | AIMIM | 12 | 2.37% | |
| 5 | Subodh Sharma | INC | 8 | 1.58% | |
| 6 | Parvez Alam | AKR | 4 | 0.79% | |
| 7 | Raj Kishor Garg | IND | 4 | 0.79% | |
| 8 | Dharmendra Kumar | IND | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 9 | Samay Singh | IND | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 10 | Abha Sharma | AAP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 11 | Lalit Kumar | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | Neeraj Goyal | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Rahul Kumar Jain | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Krishan pal | BLSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Rajnish | RSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 506 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD | 206 | 40.55% | 1 | 154 | Strong |
| BSP | 172 | 33.86% | 2 | 18 | Average |
| BJP | 91 | 17.91% | 3 | 263 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 12 | 2.36% | 4 | 114 | Poor |
| IND | 11 | 2.17% | 5 | 60 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 1.57% | 6 | 54 | Poor |
| AKR | 4 | 0.79% | 7 | 53 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.39% | 8 | 116 | Poor |
| BLSP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 314 | Poor |
| RSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 321 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 14, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.